Paul an Apostle: Romans 1:1


YHWH is unchanging and no respecter of persons. This plays out very clearly in the Bible as well as the Book of Mormon and those parts of the Doctrine & Covenants that YHWH inspired. So, where did the belief come from that what had always been counted to man for righteousness when they walked in it (Torah / the Law) had changed to wickedness? Where did the idea come from that when Yeshua fulfilled the law it meant that the Law was not the walk of faith that we were meant to follow anymore? Christians say that we get that idea from Paul but is that true? Did Paul teach us that we are not to obey the law? Did Paul teach us that the Torah is irrelevant in the lives of followers of the Messiah?

If he did, then according to Deuteronomy 13 he is a false teacher leading the people after other Gods, who ought to be put away completely. If he did, then according to Yeshua Ha Mashiach he is the least in the kingdom of Heaven and is training others to be also. He is a thief and a robber who, like his pharisaical brethren, will scarcely make it into the kingdom of Heaven himself and will bar entrance for all who follow him. Such teachers make children (followers) who are thrice the children of hell that they are. Following are the scriptural proofs for the seemingly hyperbolic statements that I have just made:

I do not believe that Paul taught that the Torah was done away with. To do so would have been outside of his character and upbringing. He persecuted the early followers of Yeshua because of his zeal for the Law. He believed the false report of the pharisees at the Greek Synagogue who claimed that Yeshua had taught against the Torah and so went about persecuting the followers of the Messiah. These verses in Phillipians highlight Paul’s zeal for the law and persecution of the church.

In this passage Paul is citing his own qualifications for salvation if Salvation was on our own merits alone. He states that he still keeps the law blameless. If he is teaching the gentiles a different walk of faith than is required for Israel, then he could not say this in truth. I believe that Paul was speaking the truth just as I believe that Joseph Smith was speaking the truth when he denied practicing polygamy. Paul and Joseph Smith both get a bad rap from people who claim to believe what they have taught but only believe the take of those who twisted their words for their own gain.

For the purpose of showing that what Paul taught was perfectly in alignment with Torah I embark on this treatment of the words of Paul. My purpose in doing this is to show people the unchanging Elohim who has always had a dependable way to walk in faith before Him and become like Him in character as we walk out our faith in diligence.

Romans 1:1

We will go through Romans chapter 1 verse by verse showing both the KJV and the New Translation / Inspired Version from Joseph Smith.

Let us also look at this verse in the New Translation.

The first thing that one notices is that, while all of the same ideas are there, the order of those ideas is different. I believe that the wording in the New Translation lends clarity to the verse. It also makes clear that his separation to the gospel is a calling to preach it. Let’s look at what is being said about Paul here.

An Apostle

I believe that the most important thing stated about Paul in this verse is that he is an apostle.

What is an Apostle?

What qualifies one to be an Apostle?

Why were there no Apostles in the Old Testament?

What is the relationship between the prophets in the Old Testament and the disciples in the New Testament and Book of Mormon?

Why do all claims of apostolic succession fail?

What is an Apostle?

I think it best, when trying to understand the idea being conveyed here, to go back to the original manuscript and see what the original word was and what it means.

From this it is clear that an Apostle is one sent out as an ambassador for the Church of Mashiach. When the Church was being established by Yeshua, he personally called twelve apostles and sent them out. Later Apostles were chosen by a vote of the Quorum or by lots. They are sent out in response to the great commission.

Contained within the great commission is the message that the apostles were to take to the world. They were to baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. They were also to teach all men everywhere to do whatsoever things YHWH (who is also Yeshua) had commanded them. They were to teach people to repent and observe Torah (every word that proceeds from the mouth of God that is not a temporary punishment). Let us examine these two points.

First, they were to baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. The prayer to be said when performing this ordinance is given twice in scripture. The first time is in 3 Nephi 11.

I brought in more than just the prayer for a reason. There is a qualification for baptism. One must have repented of their sins. Verse 27 goes over the oneness of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. The Father is in the Son and the Son is in the Father. They are two personages in the same being as is shown in the 5th Lecture on Faith. For more on the oneness of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit see the Modalism page on seekingYHWH.org.

The second time we see baptism gone over as an ordinance with set parameters is Doctrine & Covenants section 20.

Baptism is administered to those who repent. The basics of this are revealed in Torah, especially with the restorations of the New Translation. This is reiterated once again through the messenger, Joseph Smith, for this generation of believers in the Doctrine and Covenants. The baptismal candidate must have come to the age of accountability, which if you are using an inclusive Hebrew count is in your Greek seventh year of age. This is the age at which one begins to have the understanding that there are things that are right and there are things that are wrong. This understanding makes one capable of repentance. Baptizing an infant is an abomination. For more on this see “Inclusive Time” on seeking YHWH.org

When is the age of accountability?

The above verse tells us that the age for baptism is eight years old. When one takes into account inclusive time this can include anytime within the eighth year. This means that ideally your children should have been raised to be ready to commit to obey YHWH’s commandments by the time they are between exclusive 7 and 8. For those who wish to grouse and moan about the inclusion of the Book of Mormon and Doctrine & Covenants as a means of fleshing out the ordinance of baptism I would ask two questions:

  1. Do the scriptures cited actually contradict the Bible? No.
  2. Do they give greater clarity on the matter? Yes.

The other thing brought out in the Bible, Book of Mormon, and Doctrine & Covenants is that baptism is only administered to those who have repented of their sins. Baptism is an outward sign of a covenant that we have made with YHWH that we will keep all of his commandments. The only person for whom this does not include repentance is the sinless Lamb of God, Yeshua ha Mashiach.

What is sin?

If the Apostles were teaching that the Torah was done away with, they could not have fulfilled the great commission as they could not have preached repentance. Therefore, they would not have been Apostles for they would not have been preaching the gospel of He who sent them.

Heaven and Earth are still here. The Torah is still in force. Yeshua is YHWH in the flesh. YHWH is unchanging. He did not deliver a different message to those who would be saints in the New World than that which he delivered in the Old.

As you can see, our discussion on baptism led right into the second point of the great commission. They were to teach people to observe all things that YHWH had commanded them. We could refer again to Matthew 5 but I think it important to go over at this time that the commission for Yeshua’s American apostles was the same as His commission to His Palestinian ones. So let’s look at 3rd Nephi.

Rendering the Law completed and thus of no effect is the same as destroying it. Therefore, this is not what fulfilled means.

Fulfilled means fully taught and exemplified so that we may see how those who believe in Yeshua must walk. A broken heart is an obedient heart. A contrite spirit recognizes its sinful condition and need for a Savior. The obedient (broken) heart and penitent (contrite) spirit work together to bring us to that place where we can be saved, have a mighty change of heart, and walk out our faith in our Savior and exemplar by keeping the law.

Keeping the law doesn’t save us. We are saved by the blood of Yeshua through our faith (which is shown as we do what he did, thus taking his name upon us). The extension of mercy, known in various places as either salvation or justification, returns us to a state of innocence wiping the slate of our past sins clean. At this point we are no longer slaves to sin. We keep the law because it is the revelation of YHWH / Yeshua’s character, and we desire to take his name upon us. If we do not walk as He walked, then we will never have His name upon us. One of the definitions of name points to character and reputation. Definitions 5 and 9 in the 1828 Webster’s Dictionary are particularly good for pointing this out.

This is basically the message that an Apostle commissioned of Yeshua Ha Mashiach will preach.

What Qualifies One to be an Apostle ?

Yeshua chose twelve disciples who were chosen through the foreknowledge of Elohim to fulfill this role.

In the eyes of the world, these apostles were twelve random guys including fishermen, a zealot, and a tax collector, among other occupations. These men were not considered legal scholars or great teachers. They would become such but at the time of their choosing they had none of these qualifications. They were instructed by The Father on the nature of their master and this is recorded in at least one place.

As time progressed, the heart of Judas Iscariot changed and he would betray Yeshua for thirty pieces of silver.

When Judas killed himself and there was a vacancy among the twelve apostles, they sought to fill it. They chose some qualifications which are written down as to who they would extend this call to.

When they were looking for a replacement for Judas that replacement also had to be from among those disciples who had personally seen all of Yeshua’s works during his mortal ministry, meaning his daily walk as is evidenced by the use of the words “went in and out among us.” They also needed to have a personal witness of the resurrection having seen the resurrected Yeshua as per verse 22.

More light is shed on the qualifications for this work in the Book of Mormon as Yeshua calls twelve disciples there as well. He delivers instructions concerning baptism and the foundation of the gospel and then we see this:

What did Yeshua instruct them in?

They received power and directions on baptism:

They are given instruction on the relationship between the Father and the Son:

Finally, they are given the gospel.

In addition, they had received a personal witness of the resurrection of Yeshua through their own experience.

From this we can gather that an Apostle must have a knowledge of the nature of the relationship of the Father to the Son. They must have been given authority to baptize. Finally, they must have an in-depth knowledge of the gospel as well as a personal witness of the reality of the resurrection of Yeshua. People are blessed when they give heed to actual Apostles, repent, and are baptized.

More light is shed on the qualifications for this calling in the Doctrine & Covenants:

Not only are apostles meant to be a special witness of the truth and verity of the resurrection, but they must also be a special witness for the name or character of Yeshua Ha Mashiach to all of the world teaching all men to walk as Yeshua walked. The focus is on those outside the church but, as we see from the epistles of Paul, they can be of use to the membership of the church as well. This means teaching all mankind to keep Torah.

Righteousness is found in obedience to the Torah.

The set apart way involves walking by Torah or every word that proceeds from the mouth of Elohim.

Meekness is humble obedience to the word of Elohim.

Faith is Trust in Elohim to fulfill His promises evidenced in diligent obedience to the Law upon which those promises are predicated.

The Hebrew word for Charity is Tzedakah. This word means right action. Yeshua defined Charity.

John also defines Charity in his epistle.

Paul instructs us on charity.

Paul here states emphatically that signs, wonders, and prophecy may end but, in light of what Yeshua has taught, the commandments and standard of right conduct will never end. There is also contained here excellent instruction on the Spirit in which we should obey.

The prophet Mormon reiterates this teaching with some insights of his own.

Mormon brings charity back to the teaching that Yeshua gave at the beginning of this chain. If we have charity, we keep Torah. This includes giving to those in need and all other tithes and offerings.

Given that Apostles must have a special witness of the truth and verity of the resurrection then how is Paul qualified. He heard the voice of the resurrected Messiah on the road to Damascus.

What are Paul’s moral qualifications?

Belief, in the Hebrew thought pattern, is more than mental assent. It is found in conforming one’s life to that which is believed. The heresy referenced in Acts 24:14 is the resurrection of Yeshua from the dead being the first fruits of them that slept.

The Jews accused Paul of teaching that the Law was not to be followed by the sect that they referred to as Nazarenes, or those who believe in Yeshua as the Messiah. They could not prove this any more than Pauline Christianity can prove it scripturally. Paul asserts that he has kept the Law. If he is telling the truth, then he is truly qualified to be an apostle being possessed of charity. If he is lying, then Pauline Christianity is guilty of following a false prophet who is possessed of a lying spirit.

Paul was telling the truth about himself. He was a qualified apostle in every sense having experienced the resurrected Messiah and having kept and taught the Law as relevant and the revelation of the mind and will of Elohim, or in other words the revelation of the Holy Spirit.

Why were there no Apostles in the Old Testament?

For this question to be answered it requires us to take a look at the history of priesthood administration. The Melchizedek Priesthood is the power of godliness which administers in the ordinances thereof. These ordinances are the baptism of fire and the baptism of the Holy Spirit as well as the law.

This priesthood was given to Adam by YHWH’s own voice.

Just like with Yeshua it was given by the voice of our Elohim.

This priesthood was also conferred upon the righteous posterity of Adam even down to Noah. This ordination, or initiation, or instruction is often given under the hand of a mortal man who already has it. The phrase “under the hand” comes from a Hebrew idiom meaning “through the teachings.” This is informative because the ordination occurs after the individual has received instruction.

While the Melchizedek Priesthood is given by the voice of our Elohim, to be authorized to use this priesthood within a calling within the church one must also be ordained to that calling under the hand of one already having been given that authority.

Abraham sought and received the Melchizedek Priesthood.

He received it under the hand of Melchizedek, the great High Priest after whom the order was named in order to avoid vain repetition of the name of the Son.

The patriarchs all sought and received the Melchizedek priesthood and the miracles that Moses wrought under the hand of our Elohim are a testament to the fact that he had it. Something happened along the way, however, and a punishment was enacted against the children of Israel that caused this Melchizedek Priesthood to be withdrawn from the midst of the people at large.

We learn from verse one of Exodus 34 in the New Translation that the holy order or Melchizedek Priesthood was held back from the children of Israel, as a whole, because of their disobedience and lack of faith / faithfulness. This is corroborated in more modern revelation given by YHWH to the prophet Joseph Smith.

This section of the Doctrine and Covenants points to the key differences between the Melchizedek Priesthood and the Levitical Priesthood or Aaronic Priesthood, which is a lesser and preparatory priesthood that governed over the sacrificial system of the tabernacle, including the additional offerings begun as a reminding and teaching punishment for their transgression at Sinai that was designed to stir Israel up daily in remembrance of their duty to Elohim. How do we know what offerings were added to the law at Sinai? The Torah tells us.

The above verse is not talking about the beginning of the Aaronic Priesthood rather the beginning of a series of offerings given in punishment for Israel’s disobedience and performed by the tribe of Levi to whom the Aaronic priesthood was restricted following the transgression at Sinai. The rest of Numbers 28 details what was initiated at Sinai in terms of offerings. One of the other things initiated at Sinai was the limitation of the Aaronic Priesthood to the Levites. Before Sinai, YHWH had commanded all of Israel to offer their firstborn to be lesser priests. This change came about at the base of Sinai because the Levites had demonstrated repentance and loyalty to YHWH and Moses even enacting punishment upon 3,000 of the worst idolaters. The other tribes did not, and the unfaithful tribes were excluded from receiving the Aaronic Priesthood. The Melchizedek Priesthood or Holy Order after the Son of God has always been available to men who live up to it. The miracles performed by the prophets in the Old Testament could not have been done without it. Unfaithfulness kept the Melchizedek Priesthood from the people as a whole but there is evidence that the prophets held it. It is also readily apparent that the Kings of Israel held it as well. The advent of the crucifixion of Yeshua marks the end of the Law of Moses, which is Torah plus the punishments of circumcision and the daily offerings of Lambs between the mornings and between the evenings as well as the Aaronic Priesthood curse against all who are not of the Tribe of Levi. While there is no scripture that speaks of the ending of that curse explicitly I believe that it can be shown in several New Testament references including 1 Peter 2:9-10, written not to Levites but to converted Gentiles among the dispersion of Israel.

I am positive that the restriction would have to have been lifted in order for the Aaronic Priesthood to be restored to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery. The word “until” that we read about in verse 27 from section 84 can mean through the time of. Nothing in verse 27 indicates that the end of the curses was at John’s birth or death. Paul specifically said that the punishments and curses, or “handwriting of ordinances that was against us”, associated with the Law of Moses (Torah plus punishments) ended at the cross.

Why is this important? There was not enough faithfulness in Israel for there to be enough holders of the Melchizedek Priesthood to see to the needs of the believers thus establishing the Church of Meshiach, let alone have men selected from their number to be Apostles.

With Yeshua’s foreknowledge that faithfulness would increase and the curse be lifted, he began the process of calling apostles and seventies whose authority is found as an office of the Melchizedek Priesthood setting a precedent before his death and resurrection that would be followed in the church afterwards.

The Melchizedek Priesthood administers in the realm of Justification (baptism of fire) and Sanctification (baptism of the Holy Spirit) while the Aaronic Priesthood deals in the outward signs of the covenant including baptisms, sacrament, and (when restored) animal sacrifice as a sign that you have confessed your sin to God and man and have made restitution to the best of your ability thus showing that you have done what you can and leaving the forgiveness in the hands of YHWH who always forgives the soul that has truly repented of their sins.

Another difference between the Aaronic and Melchizedek Priesthoods is that Aaronic Priesthood is conferred by the laying on of hands without an oath. Melchizedek Priesthood is given by YHWH’s own voice and with an oath and covenant. It is given by Elohim to men to point us to Yeshua and to what we can look to for our redemption as is shown in the following citation:

For more information on receiving the Melchizedek Priesthood by YHWH’s own voice see Priesthood – Seeking YHWH.

The above citations from Hebrews and Doctrine and Covenants also show why Yeshua had to ordain the Apostles. The priesthood under which Apostleship falls is Melchizedek. It had to be conferred upon them by the voice of YHWH or his servants.

The Melchizedek Priesthood being restored meant that the fulness of the priesthood was again available (because righteousness was increasing), and Apostles could be called to be sent out to the world as ambassadors of the Kingdom of Heaven preaching the good news (gospel) and instructing all who would choose to obey, the way (Torah). When the Melchizedek Priesthood is generally available you will always find apostles.

The purpose of the Melchizedek Priesthood is to teach holiness, call repentance, and provide an example to look to of being like Yeshua. Apostles were called, like Yeshua, to their callings before the foundations of the world were laid as stated in Alma Chapter 13 verse 2. Alma 13:18 talks about how those who receive the Melchizedek Priesthood (which you need to be an apostle) received the call to preach repentance due to having exercised faith, which is trust in YHWH coupled with diligent obedience to every word which proceeds from His mouth.

What is the relationship between prophets and apostles?

It is plain to see, from the scriptural record, that when the Kingdom of Heaven is in good order not every Apostle is a prophet. It is also plain to see, from that same scriptural record, that not every prophet is an apostle.

This is due to the fact that the calling of Apostle is an office within the Melchizedek Priesthood that is brought about when the Church of Mashiach is to be established. Remember that the original twelve apostles were called by Yeshua before there was a church. This is because it is the calling of Apostles to establish the church from the world. When the appointed time comes for a restoration of Torah, YHWH/ Yeshua calls Apostles himself. After the church is established vacancies within the quorum are filled by the method determined by the vote of the quorum. When there is not enough faithfulness among YHWH’s people for the Church of Mashiach to be established, which unfaithfulness results in the Melchizedek Priesthood being withheld from the people at large there are not enough Melchizedek Priesthood holders to sustain the Church let alone call some from out of their number to be Apostles; aka sent ones.

While the apostolic calling is an office within the Church of Mashiach, being a prophet is a calling directly from the mouth of Elohim. While the first apostles were chosen by YHWH/Yeshua Himself, later apostles were called by the other apostles according to the voice of the quorum. The President of the Church is always called by the voice of the church and upheld in the confidence of the same, at least that is the way it is supposed to be, for scriptural support for this see Seeking YHWH Church Government. Among other things, a prophet is a messenger for Elohim and will receive the Melchizedek Priesthood upon or before receiving his calling from YHWH even though the rest of Israel is under condemnation. In order for an individual to be called to be a prophet they must have the Melchizedek Priesthood given to them. This is done by the voice of Elohim. There are reports of prophets outside of the apostles in the New Testament Church. A good portion of the Old Testament is the recorded words of the prophets. Prophets exist independent of the called-out assembly or church and have always been the means for keeping the church on the straight and narrow. When the twelve apostles were called in the New Testament, they were called by the original prophet like unto Moses, Yeshua.

Why Do All Claims of Apostolic Succession Fail?

In order to answer this question, one must internalize and understand the answers to the previous questions and points discussed in this post. Are the same doctrines taught in the organizations that claim apostolic succession as were taught by the Savior and the apostles? It is readily apparent that the Catholic, Greek Orthodox, LDS, and any other sect that claims apostolic succession do not have doctrines, practices, and ceremonies that are similar to those put forward in the Bible, Book of Mormon, and Doctrine & Covenants and therefore are different from those which apostles of YHWH / Yeshua would teach. True apostles of YHWH / Yeshua would teach according to his already revealed mind and will, or Torah. If the doctrines, practice, and ceremonies don’t align with that which YHWH has already revealed, that please him, aka Torah, then you have a failure to remain within apostolic teaching. For more information on Christianity’s variance from biblical teaching I would refer you to Frank Viola’s Pagan Christianity.

The next failure that we must examine is the characters of the men from whom stem the teachings of the organizations that claim apostolic succession. Did these men walk in obedience to every word that had proceeded from the mouth of YHWH, or did they excuse their sins? You will find that almost, if not completely, universally they excused worshipping as the pagans did. Many of these teachers had morality issues, and most have called the revealed mind and will of Elohim, known as Torah, to be inferior to Greek morality and thought. Many have used their esteemed positions within the church to hide their sins. This invalidates their priesthood.

Verse 37 uses the word “Amen” in an unusual way. Amen is typically used at the end of prayers as an assent to that which has been prayed. It is a shorthand way of saying, “let it be so.” Here it is being used to indicate a heavenly cessation, or stopping, of a man’s priesthood and authority. In no other place in scripture is this use of amen indicated. You do often see amen used at the end of Psalms bringing them to a close, but it is always in that sense of, “let it be so,” that we have already talked about. It is always isolated and never found in the middle of a sentence. Why is Elohim using amen in this sense in this verse?

The word amen when spoken at the end of a prayer indicates an assent to all that has been prayed and should carry in it an ultimate submission to the will of the Father, whom you have petitioned with your prayer. What I see being expressed here is that when men try to use YHWH’s priesthood in any degree of unrighteousness then, according as YHWH has decreed, so shall their priesthood be invalidated.

For example, Judas Iscariot was called with the same calling as the other apostles but was offended by Yeshua later, betrayed him, took his own life and for this cause lost his priesthood.

Furthermore, when Israel violated the covenant and betrayed YHWH at the base of Mount Sinai, YHWH took the Melchizedek Priesthood from their midst, as a whole, though Moses still had it and Joshua received it.

From this decree of what happens to the Melchizedek Priesthood in the face of rebellion and unfaithfulness we can get a context for how amen is used in verse 37 of section 121. The decree of Elohim is that the rebellious and unfaithful cannot wield His power.

This leads us straight into the third point of failure for all organizations that claim authority due to apostolic succession. Their priesthood has failed because they are rebellious and unfaithful. They were unfaithful because they broke His commandments and taught others to do the same.

The Melchizedek Priesthood is given by YHWH’s own voice. Wicked and sinful man cannot stand in the presence of YHWH. They will be consumed. Therefore, the rebellious and unfaithful will not receive the Melchizedek Priesthood and they will lose the ability to pass it on when they forsake YHWH.

Let’s Bring This Back to Paul

So, how does all of this apply to Paul? Very simply, in order for Paul’s claim that he is an apostle to not be invalidated, he would have to teach to come under Yeshua’s covering for justification and keeping Torah, like Yeshua did, as the walk of faith that leads to sanctification. He would have to be living these principles, and he would have to have received the apostolic calling from YHWH or his authorized servants as taught in Doctrine and Covenants 1:38. He also has to have a personal witness of the physical reality of the resurrection.

From this we can gather that, as a true Apostle of Yeshua ha Mashiach, Paul was in favor of the ongoing validity of Torah, though he did preach against the continued practice of the punishment that was the Law of Moses, and he taught against the oral torah, and that he strove to practice Torah as faithfully as His master Yeshua did. He was called by Yeshua himself and ordained in the calling by Yeshua’s authorized servants. It was known to the people that he had authority in the Torah based sect known as Nazarenes.

From this we can also deduce that the mainstream representation of Paul’s teachings is faulty. It has been handed down to them from the unlearned and unstable Early Christian Fathers, who were the founders of apostasy within the ranks of the Nazarenes. Their understanding of Paul’s words sets him at odds with his master and himself, which is illogical. We do need to understand that even Paul’s brethren among the apostles said that Paul’s words were hard to understand without proper education and grounding in the law.

The greek word that the KJV translates as simply wicked is athesmos. Athesmos is more properly translated as lawless. So, when someone provides an interpretation of Paul’s words that points to him teaching the error of lawlessness, Peter in 2 Peter 3:15-17 is telling you that their understanding of Paul is off. They need to go back to the drawing board and take into account that every word of Elohim is still valid and from this perspective come to a better understanding of what Paul is actually saying.

Paul did not teach people lawlessness. He did teach them that the punishments enacted from, and added to, Torah were done away with, having been brought to an end when Yeshua took the sins of the faithful upon Him at the cross, but he did not teach the Nazarenes to abandon Torah. He taught them to follow him as he followed Yeshua.

If Paul had been teaching people to turn away from the Torah he would have been at odds with his master and thus by his own words, we would not have to follow him. He was not at odds with Yeshua but, as we will find as we go through Romans, in coming posts, his teachings are in line with Yeshua and Torah.

I encourage everyone who reads this to reconsider the lens from which they understand the words of Paul. Reconciliation of the word is possible if we are not looking for excuses to invalidate that which we do not want to follow.


Leave a comment